Aborto:
aspectos jurídicos, clínicos e perspectivas em diferentes religiões
Keywords:
Aborto. Clínica. Religião. Legislação.Abstract
Este artigo tem por objetivo apresentar a realidade do aborto nas diferentes esferas sociais, privilegiando os aspectos legais, clínicos e religiosos que envolvem o tema. Para isso, a revisão bibliográfica se fará presente, com argumentos pró e contra o aborto. A questão é melindrosa e por isso deve ser tratada com o máximo de cuidado, sempre buscando valorizar a vida e bem-estar de todos os seres humanos. Deliberar a respeito da existência ou não de uma vida humana ultrapassa diferentes percepções e impõe sobre aqueles que se encontram com essa responsabilidade equilíbrio e imparcialidade para que os equívocos, se possível, não aconteçam. É necessário que se considere os aspectos biológicos, psíquicos e religiosas para que qualquer parecer emitido não privilegie somente um desses aspectos. O assunto é relevante e delicado, causando desconforto nos diferentes seguimentos sociais, dentre eles, os religiosos que, dependendo do tipo de instituição seja, condem o aborto
References
BRYAR, S. H. One day you’re pregnant and one day you’re not: pregnancy interruption for fetal anomalies. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, v. 26, n. 5, p. 559-66, 1997.
CAMPOS, A. Crime ou castigo? Da perseguição das mulheres até a despenalização do aborto. Coimbra: Almedina, 2007.
CALLAHAN, D. The roman catholic position. In: STEFFEN, L. (ed.). Abortion: a reader. Cleveland: Pilgrim Library of Ethics, 1996
CHARLES, V. E.; POLIS, C. B.; SRIDHARA, S. K. Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence. Contraception, v. 78, n. 6, p. 436-50, 2008.
CLOTET, J. Bioética como ética aplicada e genética. Bioética, v. 5, n. 2, p. 173-83, 1997.
COSTA, L. L. F. et al. Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality incompatible with life: women’s experiences in Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters, v. 13, n. 26, p. 139-46, 2005.
CORSELLO, G.; GIUFFRÈ, M. Congenital malformations. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, v. 25, sup1, p. 25-9, 2012.
DEMIREL, S. Abortion from an Islamic ethical point of view. Int J Bus Soc Sci, v. 2, n. 1, p. 230-37, 2011.
DUGOFF, L. Ultrasound diagnosis of structural abnormalities in the first trimester. Prenatal Diagnosis, v. 22, n. 4, p. 316-20, 2002.
FARRARIS, L. Bibliotheca Iuridica Moralis Theologica. Roma: Rarebooksclub, 2013.
GARNE, E. et al. EUROCAT website data on prenatal detection rates of congenital anomalies. Journal of Medical Screening, v. 17, n. 2, p. 97-8, 2010.
HANSCHMIDT, F. et al. Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale. PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 6, p. 1-18, 2018.
HERN, W. M. Fetal diagnostic indications for second and third trimester outpatient pregnancy termination. Prenat Diagn, v. 34, n. 1, p. 438-44, 2014.
KOERICH, M. S.; MACHADO, R. R.; COSTA, E. Ética e bioética: para dar início à reflexão. Texto Contexto Enferm, v. 14, n. 1, p. 106-10, 2005.
LAFARGE, C.; MITCHELL, K.; FOX, P. Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality: a meta-ethnography of women’s experiences. Reprod Health Matters, v. 22, n. 1, p. 191-201, 2014.
LAFLEUR, W. R. Liquid life: abortion and buddhism and Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.
LECSO, P. A. A buddhist view of abortion. In: STEFFEN, L. (ed.). Abortion: a reader. Cleveland: Pilgrim Library of Ethics, 1996.
LEITE, D. L.; MIZIARA, H.; VELOSO, M. Malformações cardíacas congênitas em necropsias pediátricas- características, associações e prevalência. Arq Bras Cardiol, v. 94, n. 3, p. 294-9, 2010.
LEÓN CORREA, F. J. Abortion from a bioethical viewpoint: autonomy and beneficency versus justice? J Clin Res Bioeth, v. 4, n. 1, p. 151-6, 2013.
LEUTHNER, S. R. Borderline viability: controversies in caring for the extremely premature infant. Clin Perinatol, v. 41, n. 3, p. 799-814, 2014.
LEWIS, J. A. Jewish perspectives on pregnancy and childbearing. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs, v. 28, n. 1, p. 306-12, 2003.
LUNA, N. Abortion, embryos, euthanasia, and gender theory: an anthropological analysis of the Catholic Church’s Bioethics. Manual at World Youth Day. Vibrant, Virtual Braz. Anthrv. 15, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2018.
MAGUIRE, D. C. Sacred rights: the case for contraception and abortion in world religions. Oxford: University Press, 2003.
McCOYD, J. L. Pregnancy interrupted: loss of a desired pregnancy after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, v. 28, n. 1, p. 37-48, 2007.
MELO, G. Problemática religiosa de la mujer que aborta. In: ENCUENTRO DE INVESTIGADORES SOBRE ABORTO INDUCIDO EN AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE. Santafé de Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colómbia, 1994.
MIZIARA, I. D.; MIZIARA, C. S. Moral consensus theory: paradigm cases of abortion and orthothanasia in Brazil. Indian Journal of Medicals Ethics, v. 10, n. 1, p. 58-61, 2013.
OGLAND, C. P.; VERONA, A. P. Religion and attitudes toward abortion and abortion policy in Brazil. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, v. 50, n. 4, p. 812-21, 2011.
PADELA, A. I. Medical ethics in religious traditions: a study of Judaism, Catholicism and Islam. J Islam Med Assoc, v. 38, n. 5, p. 106-17, 2006.
PATIL, A. B. et al. Medical ethics in abortion. Indian Journal of Clinical Practice, v. 25, n. 6, p. 544-8, 2014.
PRADO, D. O que é aborto. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1985.
ROLHA, P. M. P. B. Malformações fetais: que futuro? Dissertação (Mestrado em Bioestatística e Biometria) – Universidade Aberta, Lisboa, 2015.
SANTOS, R. S.; DIAS, I. M. V. Refletindo sobre a malformação congênita. Rev Bras Enferm, v. 58, n 5, p. 592-6, 2005.
SCHMITZ, D. Terminating pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis – with a little help of professional ethics? J Med Ethics, v. 38, n. 3, p. 399-402, 2012
STEINBERG, A. Abortion for fetal CNS malformations: religious aspects. Child’s Nervous System, v. 19, n. 7-8, p. 592-5, 2003.
SULLINS, P. Catholic/Protestant trends on abortion: convergence and polarity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, v. 38, n. 3, p. 354-69, 1999.
VILLE, Y. Fetal therapy: practical ethical considerations. Prenat Diagn, v. 31, n. 1, p. 621-7, 2011.
WITOONPANICH, P. Ethics and rule in obstetrics and gynecology rule of ethics for obstetricians and gynecologists. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol, v. 19, n. 1, p. 155-7, 2011.
WOOL, C. Systematic review of the literature: parental outcomes after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Advances in Neonatal Care, v. 11, n. 3, p. 182-92, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Davar Polissêmica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
I (we) submit this original and unpublished work, authored by me (us), for review by the journal Davar Polissêmica, an interdisciplinary journal of Religious Studies, Theology, and related fields, based at IPEMIG College, and I (we) agree to share the copyrights pertaining to this work with DAVAR and that its “content, or part thereof, may be copied, distributed, edited, remixed, and used to create other works, always within the limits of copyright and related rights legislation,” in any medium, whether print or electronic, provided that credit is given to the text and its authorship, including references to DAVAR. I (we) further declare that there is no conflict of interest between the topic addressed, the author(s), and any companies, institutions, or individuals.
I (We) further acknowledge that DAVAR is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) LICENSE: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Therefore, I (WE) PERMIT, “to maximize the dissemination of information,” that others distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon this work, provided they give proper credit for the original creation.
